Compare AI models: Ling 3.1 Flash vs Grok 4.7
- Ling 3.1 FlashinclusionAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 100/100 | 61/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Grok 4.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 77/100 | 30/100 | 73/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.00/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$0.00/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
455
16K
Completed sessions
5,926
34,884
Token share
0%
0%
Tokens
3B+100%
20B+100%
AUG 8OCT 2
AUG 8OCT 2
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending